New Turkey Report: Counter-terrorism legislation criminalises freedom of expression
PEN Norway publishes a new legal report examining the indictments issued against Kurdish journalist and women’s rights activist Nurcan Yalçın.
The report analyses two merged indictments brought by the Diyarbakır Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, in which journalistic work, membership in a women’s organisation, social media posts, and a small monetary transfer (app. 63 Euros) to a detainee are treated as terrorism-related offences. Through a detailed legal assessment, the report demonstrates how counter-terrorism legislation is used to criminalise freedom of expression, association, and civil solidarity.
The analysis reveals that the indictments rely on vague and abstract allegations, anonymous witness statements, and evidence that is either decontextualised or wholly insufficient. Activities protected under international human rights law—such as reporting on conflict, participating in women’s rights organisations, and expressing political criticism—are reframed as acts of terrorism without demonstrating intent, violence, or an organic link to any armed organisation. The report underscores how this approach reflects a broader pattern of judicial harassment targeting journalists, women’s movements, and Kurdish civil society in Turkey.
In its concluding assessment, the author of the report, Gülşah Kurt emphasises that the indictments fail to meet both domestic legal requirements and Turkey’s international human rights obligations. The report warns that expanding terrorism charges to cover lawful expression and association poses a serious chilling effect on civil society and undermines the rule of law.
PEN Norway calls for an end to prosecutions based on abstract assumptions rather than concrete evidence, and urges the consistent application of international standards protecting freedom of expression, association, and the right to a fair trial.
TR:
İnceleme, iddianamelerin soyut ve belirsiz suçlamalara, gizli tanık beyanlarına ve bağlamından koparılmış delillere dayandığını gösteriyor. Uluslararası insan hakları hukuku kapsamında koruma altında olan gazetecilik faaliyetleri, kadın hareketi içindeki çalışmalar ve sert siyasi eleştiriler; şiddet, kast ya da örgütsel bağ ortaya konulmaksızın terör faaliyeti olarak sunuluyor. Rapor, bu yaklaşımın Türkiye’de özellikle gazeteciler, kadın örgütleri ve Kürt sivil toplumuna yönelik yapısal bir yargısal baskının parçası olduğuna dikkat çekiyor.
Raporun sonuç bölümünde, yazar Gülşah Kurt iddianamelerin hem iç hukuka hem de Türkiye’nin taraf olduğu uluslararası insan hakları sözleşmelerine açıkça aykırı olduğunu vurguluyor. Terör suçlarının, somut delil yerine varsayımlara dayanarak genişletilmesinin sivil alan üzerinde caydırıcı bir etki yarattığına işaret eden rapor, ifade özgürlüğü, örgütlenme özgürlüğü ve adil yargılanma hakkının korunmasına yönelik uluslararası standartların derhal uygulanması çağrısında bulunuyor.





